1-Key Concepts of the video and article
Key Concepts: CNN - What the brain draws from: Art and neuroscience
Pattern processing is a very important aspect
of the human species that helped us to survive when we lived as animals, and
now that we no longer live that way that same aspect of our brains allows us to
appreciate and understand art. Humans are able to recognize images made
completely out of outlines, see faces in abstract art, and create 3-dimensional
on a 2-dimensional canvas are all possible due to our highly evolved pattern
processing capabilities.
Key concepts: Aesthetics: Philosophy of the Arts
This
video focuses on the definition of aesthetics, a philosophical theory of what
is beautiful and what is art, based on the ideas from various philosophers,
from Plato in the fourth century BCE up until the modern era. It shows how the
idea of aesthetics have changed dramatically throughout the ages, either as a
reaction to terrible events such as war and famine, or as a new technology such
as photography frees the artist to be as free as they want to be.
Key concepts: Evolutionary Origins of Art and
Aesthetics
This video focused on the neurobiological origins of art and the
effects that art has on the human brain. I learned that how we perceive art is
a continuation of our survival mechanisms that we have honed over the last
millions of years to recognize prey and predators.
2.
Which philosopher's theory on aesthetics do you feel is most important? Be sure
to mention the philosophers name, era (time in history), and contribution to
the aesthetic theory in your response.
I believe that RG Collingwood's advancement of the concept
of expressionism in the early 20th century was the most important theory of
aesthetics. He believed that the purpose of art was more to express the
emotions of the artist at the time of creation of that art than it was to elicit
responses in the audience.
3 - What do you think about
Changeux and Ramachandran scientific view of aesthetics and art? What was the
most interesting fact you discovered from each speakers lecture?
Changeux’s lecture gives us a neurobiologist’s
point of view on how we perceive art and its evolutionary origins as a
descendant of tool use by primitive ancestors of humans. He gives many examples
of how viewing art affects our brains on a biological level, such as how our
brains perceive obvious images versus unobvious images. The most interesting
fact that I learned from Changeux’s lecture was his explanation of how the
brain reacts to surprise and how it relates to an artist’s search for novelty
in their art.
Ramachandran’s lecture’s main idea seemed to
be that art is about ‘deliberately altering’ an image to ‘produce pleasing
effects on the human brain.’ The most interesting thing that I learned from
Ramachandran’s lecture was about teaching shapes to rats and their
understanding of the rules, which in his example was teaching a rat the
difference between a square and a rectangle by placing food in the rectangle
and not in the square. If shown a rectangle that is even more stretched out, ie
less square and more rectangular, the rat will prefer that over a rectangle
with sides that are closer to the same side because that rule of rectangularity
is what the rat has come to associate with food.
4 -
How do the videos and article relate to the readings in the text?
The article and the
neurobiological video relates to the text as an expansion on how the human
brain is wired as a pattern processing machine and how that relates to our
perception of art. The philosophy of aesthetics video helps to explain the
history of aesthetics and how art has changed from its beginnings to where it
is now, as our understanding and definition of art and beauty has changed
through the centuries.
5
- What is your opinion of the films and
article? How do they add depth to understanding of the topics in your reading
in the text?
I
enjoyed the article thoroughly because it was easier to grasp the information
that was presented at my own pace and in my own voice. I had trouble with
Changeux’s accent, which along with the inability to read a lot of the
information on the slides that he was presenting, made following his lecture
pretty difficult. I had to rewind a lot. I believe they added a lot to my
understanding of the biological and neurological aspects of art, as the book
doesn’t delve into them very much.